Fruit flies use two muscles to control pitch for stable flight

The flight of insects may look effortless but, as with any animal, their movements would be wildly uneven without an intricate system of neural signaling and muscle response to stabilize and steer them.

A Cornell-led collaboration used a combination of targeted neural manipulation and magnetic perturbance to pinpoint the two components of a fruit fly’s flight stabilization system. Specifically, the researchers identified two elements of the steering muscle system responsible for the actuation of two separate control signals that enable the insect to stabilize its pitch: angular displacement and angular velocity. The finding provides evidence for an organizational principle in which each muscle has a specific function in flight control.

The group’s paper, “Neuromuscular Embodiment of Feedback Control Elements in Drosophila Flight,” published Dec. 14 in Science Advances. The paper’s lead author is Sam Whitehead, Ph.D. ’21.

In order to parse this complex neuromuscular system, the team – led by senior author Itai Cohen, professor of physics in the College of Arts and Sciences – studied flies that had been genetically engineered to make use of a technique called optogenetics, which installs light-sensitive channels on specific neurons. By shining a light on the fly, the researchers could turn on or off specific motor neurons, affecting the function of whatever muscle that neuron activates.

In addition, each fly had small ferromagnetic pins glued to the dorsal side of its thorax, which enabled the researchers to disrupt its flight by applying a magnetic field. The disturbance caused the fly to pitch forward or backward – essentially “tripping” the fly mid-air – and, using three high-speed cameras filming at 8,000 frames per second, the researchers captured the fly’s efforts to generate a corrective torque and recover from this perturbation.

The fly’s stabilization reflex begins with the haltere, a sensory apparatus that is actually the remnants of the fly’s third and fourth wings, and serves as a kind of balancing organ. The haltere registers the rate of rotation of the fly’s body, then sends rapid feedback through a neural circuit to the fly’s 12 wing muscles that steer and stabilize it. 

The researchers modeled these reflexes with what’s known as a proportional-integral controller – a control loop of sorts that compensates for feedback, similar to cruise-control systems in automobiles.

“They feed the information from sensory systems to these two components of the controller, the integral part and the proportional part, which get summed together,” Cohen said. “This combined signal determines, through the wing muscles, the new wing-stroke parameter that will provide a corrective aerodynamic torque, which acts on the fly body, which then acts on the sensor, providing a closed circuit.”

The researchers determined the fly’s b1 and b2 muscles were directly responsible for the angular displacement (the integral term) and angular velocity (the proportional term) that govern its wing forward sweep angle.

Cohen and Whitehead worked with a range of collaborators, including co-author Nilay Yapici, assistant professor of neurobiology and behavior and Nancy and Peter Meinig Family Investigator in the Life Sciences; Jesse Goldberg, associate professor of neurobiology and behavior; and Joseph Fetcho, the Dr. David and Dorothy Joslovitz Merksamer Professor of Biological Science, all in the College of Arts and Sciences.

“What’s at stake is understanding how a biological system like the fly, using neurons and muscles, implements a control strategy that’s ubiquitous in human-engineered systems,” Whitehead said. “We’re especially excited that our findings are not only a first step in that direction, but also a proof of concept for future studies that explore these neural circuits more holistically.”

Co-authors include postdoctoral researcher Matt Meiselman; and researchers from Villanova University, California Institute of Technology, Johns Hopkins University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Research Campus.

The research was supported by the National Institute of Health, National Science Foundation, Janelia Research Campus Visitor Project Program, U.S. Department of Defense, Army Research Office and Office of Naval Research.